Feet rating stats (1375 total votes)
988
beautiful
beautiful
249
nice
nice
97
ok
ok
26
bad
bad
15
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
| Page: | Displaying Page 1 (pictures 1 - 100, out of 175). |
more info45 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Danielle Fishel's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2025-01-01 07:47:29 Gorgeous Goddess. This breathtaking pic is in the top 10 in all of wiki feet.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2025-02-09 02:22:05 Topanga(!) was a whole other level
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-11-02 10:59:41 I grew up watching this woman and my God she is even finer now than back in the 90s. She is a gift from God.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-12-05 10:43:17 I don't even like coffee, let alone coffee creamer, but I love this pic!
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-08-18 09:22:37 Now I want coffee (without the nasty, chemical-laden creamer, though.
|
|
2024-03-08 00:11:57 I love that she wears toe rings and has been for 20+ years. Very cute peds.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-03-08 00:36:32 i hate toe rings...all they do is get in the way but to each their own...but there is no doubt that her feet are epic
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-05-27 12:34:15 Me too, I love her toe rings
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-05-27 12:43:38 Attention grabbers... Girls who wear them are saying, "HEY, look at my feet. They are hot, Hot, HOTTT!!!" - Usually, but not quite always, girls who believe their feet are hot, are correct, plus the BONUS is that their attitude toward the use of their feet to attract you will be a positive one. Basically, get a girl who likes to wear toe rings and you are on the road to winning big.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-04-02 20:51:25 This message is directly for Danielle and Jensen (producer of Pod Meets World and Magical Rewind, husband to us all)
I was going to post this yesterday, but I took a day because I wanted to make sure I worded this correctly. To me (your many, many fans) this is very important. During the pre-pod chat in yesterdays episode of Pod Meets World (IMDb episode 206 - Amy Jo Johnson Meets World) Danielle broached the idea of starting an OF page for her feet. Rider and Will joked a bit, but neither were against the idea. Danielle herself seemed pretty opened to it, only a bit worried about the potential for people to use it to sexualize her. I just wanted to address this a little bit. So, Danielle said that her experience with the community has been guys showing up at her conventions requesting signatures on pictures that were clearly wikifeet level material. Like, pictures that were intended to have her bare feet showing. She said that she had considered turning these guys away (as she does with men who request for her to sign her Maxim pics), or at least signing over her feet so that they were not visible. I 100% agree with her. These guys are being creepy af, and using an environment that is not intended for that sort of thing to try and both trick her or maybe even get a rise out of her (depending on her subtle or obvious they're being). You should turn these guys (or anyone else else who makes you uncomfortable) away and not feel a hint of guilt or shame for standing up for yourself. With that said, I promise you that 99% of guys who like feet are not like that. We're just normal people who have been your fans for decades now and who happen to find a part of you particularly visually ascetic. I have been to conventions and 2 live Pod shows to see (and once "meet") you and (while I always appreciate that you always show toes) I have never tried to creep on your feet or treat you as anything other than a person I admire. If you were to open a page that was of your feet you would be entirely in control of the content. It could all be 100% "G" rated and I (and many, many others) would happily subscribe and pay you monthly. This is not the same as doing any sort of nude content. Feet are not private parts. They're "public parts" (lol) that we all show to anyone around us at the beach or whatever anyways. Taking pictures of yourself barefoot while being fully clothed is not even lewd, let alone anything beyond that. For me, something that I have always admired about Danielle is something she talks about as a negative now. That is, her desire to make sure that we all know that she doesn't think that she is too good for us. Unfortunately, some men have taken advantage of that in her life. But in this, I think that Danielle and Jensen have the chance to reclaim it. To do exactly what Danielle is comfortable with and nothing more, and all in line with what Jensen is okay with as her husband. The last thing I'll say is this; As someone who has been a fan of Danielle and a fan of beautiful ladies with beautiful feet for basically my entire life - if you do open a feet page on OF you will make SO MUCH $$$ that you will never think that dropping $5,000.oo a Vegas is a big deal again! We all will be yelling "Shut up and take all of our money!" I'll always be a fan regardless, but I really really hope you open a foot modeling page, Danielle! |
|
2024-04-02 20:57:58 This is the longest approvable comment I've seen so far.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-04-02 21:48:57 Danielle Fishel and Tiffani Thiessen are two people that I think should really consider making an OF page solely for their feet. I've seen Tiffani joke about it in her Instagram comments last year (along with showing her feet a decent amount) and now Danielle is entertaining the OF feet page convo on Pod Meets World. I can't speak for them, but I think it is definitely a smart move for the both of them.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-05-05 07:37:55 Awesome little toes.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-05-05 04:06:07 One of my young adult crushes.
|
|
2022-12-01 07:06:03 Yes, I love girls with chubby feet.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 16:46:27 upscale from what exactly... a scan or a digital photo?
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 17:00:32 Yes, this photo is "enhanced", I know this because @ProfoundlyEntangled wrote about it, mostly I am against computer enhancement of photos, but in this case I agreed with him---but if there is an original photo in the gallery then the enhanced ones have to go!
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 17:42:56 An original what??? If it's shot DIGITAL it's one thing, if it was SCANNED from paper, it's another and enhancements are required. We can't have "original" paper here. You've got to have some scanning experience in the pre-digital era to understand this. I just unmarked the PQ on this scan.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 18:13:46 @Ye Olde Doc The enhancements you speak of came way before AI upscaling did.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 14:40:01 yep, very nice shot!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-01-20 15:14:17 lol. Thank you. The previous version was poorly edited by me years ago. Today, I tracked down the original unaltered version which was not easy to find. Even then, it is SUPER grainy. I used an app called Remini to fix it up. I think it came out pretty good.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 15:53:43 hm, I mean I don't support putting here pictures that are modified, the rules of this site say that original pictures are preferred, but I don't report this pic.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 16:00:36 In this case however it appears to be a SCAN from years back, and scans from print media need clean-up, anything from dust to print and paper patterns.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-01-20 16:20:14 If you guys saw the original source, you’d be thanking me. It’s the equivalent of taking a 50 year old movie and restoring in 4K. Are we gonna be this petty?
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 16:25:11 You must be new here because the answer is YES.
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 17:22:16 Actually, the answer is not yes, let's check the rules---if this photo is the only one and the original is not here in the gallery then we don't remove his photo
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-01-20 17:24:24 But I won't argue about it because I just got back from exile and I don't want to go back there!
|
