Lea Thompson (I)
Go to IMDb page
Feet rating stats (1401 total votes)
742
beautiful
beautiful
351
nice
nice
212
ok
ok
66
bad
bad
30
ugly
ugly
Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
You Rated: | (click to rate) |
Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts |
Gallery Settings
more info96 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Lea Thompson's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-08-29 13:07:38 Ok now I always had the hots for Lea since Howard the duck film so my nice side says how cute and my perverted side says this ain’t doggie style!!
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2024-08-29 13:23:22 A fat dog is usually a sign of a pet owner that does not get enough exercise.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-09-10 20:41:40 your comment is
|
2021-09-10 20:24:28 Are you kidding me?🙄
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2020-03-16 00:36:59 I have been looking into Wikifeet since 2005. I have a look at a chick’s foot whenever that person comes to attention in media etc. What I have found, and it is my own opinion, is that many rate feet at 5 stars, if the person is a superstar or Hollywood taker, or sports chick. When their feet are really at best 4 stars. Oh well, it doesn’t really matter in the long run. However, I will rate feet how they attract me, which is a very complicated algorithm. Don’t ask me to explain it. As for these feet, I rate three stars.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-02-20 16:04:36 It’s all subjective. I’m sure someone you consider to be 5 stars would only be 3 stars to someone else. No one is right or wrong when it comes to these things.
|
2021-02-20 16:07:16 wikiFeet was launched in 2008. Bogus argumentum ad verecundiam.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-02-20 16:11:42 Pfft, I've been looking into Wikifeet since 1955...
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2021-02-20 16:18:14 I started looking into wikifeet from 1912.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-02-20 16:47:39 Oh yeah!? Well back in the day when me and Jesus were bored we'd load up wikifeet on the old stone tablet and rate a few galleries.
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2021-02-20 17:07:43 Let me tell you when I was looking into Wikifeet and that asteroid hit us and my T-Rex died...
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-02-20 17:11:33 @MrBadGuy
That's sad... What was his name? |
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2021-02-20 17:11:57 I'm giving her 4 stars because I couldn't find anything really wrong with them, and not 5 stars because I couldn't find anything really extra nice about them.
|
2021-02-20 17:16:18 Pff, that's nothing, I was looking into WF when Earth was still in the Hadean Eon..
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-02-22 02:38:27 Earth? I was checking out wikifeet since before Earth existed.
|
2021-06-02 14:44:28 Internet connection sucked back in 1776. One of the reasons the 13 colonies declared independence is because British Telecom was a shitty provider, and a picture of Eliza Schuyler's ankle boots would take hours to download.
|