Feet rating stats (27 total votes)
2
beautiful
beautiful
0
nice
nice
0
ok
ok
4
bad
bad
21
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (ugly feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
People who liked Alisa Polack's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2021-11-10 20:09:12 These have a 'right' to be here as much as any other entry, in the same way they that we users have the right to ignore/disregard them. However, it seems cruel to post these when it can be anticipated that they will only invite ridicule. The poster wrote 'Enjoy!' knowing full well that this will not be the experience most (if not all) of us have should we view them. I'd like to believe that we are better than that.
|
|
2021-11-10 20:29:01 If you want all galleries with too many Ugly ratings be automatically removed, contact @Creator and suggest it.
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2021-11-11 01:25:38 I can foresee trolls abusing that to get galleries of decent or average removed. As it is, plenty will vote 1 star on feet others may view differently. Another factor are the "bunion lovers" that love bunions and may miss out on what they like. Finally, I think wikifeet is partially a resource site, a place to look up any celeb and see their feet, good, bad, or ugly. Anyway, there are arguments pro and contra.
|
|
2021-11-11 13:34:35 I don't care about having ugly galleries removed (and trust me, '@Creator' doesn't give a damn about what is posted as long as it generates traffic). Ye Olde Doc is right- there is something for everyone; foot admiration is purely subjective. What bothers me is the spirit in which this is done. These posts weren't made for the purpose of giving others the opportunity to admire/enjoy them- they were made for shock value,and I find that to be cruel.
|
|
2021-11-11 13:36:56 @Ye Olde Doc Maybe the feature can be applied by the account that activates it, instead of being system-wide.
|
|
2021-11-10 13:13:38 Why does this gallery exist
|
|
2021-11-10 13:19:08 If it can exist, then why not?
|
|
2021-11-10 13:27:32 Wikifeet unlike what it's represented as in it's core is a sexual site, WTF is this
|
|
2021-11-10 13:40:01 @FootSoldier77 You're wrong, and that's why it's allowed. ;)
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2021-11-10 14:21:16 It's a baseline of what 1 star actually is. Baselines or points of reference at either end gives one a better sense of proportion.
|
|
2021-11-11 01:02:17 I tottally disagree. Wikifeet is not a sexual site at all. Wikifeet is an esthetic site.
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2021-11-11 01:19:22 Wikifeet is a RESOURCE !!! Look up a celeb and see their feet!!! What YOU decide to do with that, is up to you. It's a wikipedia for feet, a google image resource for concentrated feet attached to famous (at least to a degree) people.
|
|
2021-11-09 18:39:46 Enjoy!
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2021-11-11 01:15:09 The beautiful girl with glasses is Dr. Ebonie Vincent:
https://www.wikifeet.com/Ebonie_Vincent |
|
2021-11-11 01:17:55 @Ethanol Thanks!
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2021-11-10 12:35:28 Good grief. If there is a good qualifier for ugly feet, these are the ones.
|
|
2021-11-10 06:23:31 Why?
|
|
2021-11-10 06:25:34 Why not?
|
|
2021-11-10 07:18:24 I agree, why. I'm not going to waste a ranking.
|
