wFicons Created with Bez
The collaborative celebrity feet website

Alisa Polack's Feet

Actress | Producer
wikiFeet Score:
1 Stars
Tap to rate
Rating distribution
Total votes: 30
Celeb's IMDb page
Birth date: [ Not set ]
Birthplace: United States
Height: [ Not set ]
Shoe size: [ Not set ]
Photos
Videos
Mentions
Hands (beta)

Similar feet

If you liked this page, you may want to check out:

Christine Bunting

Tawheeda Jan

Bridgette

Comment section

For discussions over symmetry and aesthetics. Keep it classy, be respectful, avoid political topics.
2021-11-10
These have a 'right' to be here as much as any other entry, in the same way they that we users have the right to ignore/disregard them. However, it seems cruel to post these when it can be anticipated that they will only invite ridicule. The poster wrote 'Enjoy!' knowing full well that this will not be the experience most (if not all) of us have should we view them. I'd like to believe that we are better than that.
Patriarch (Recruit)
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2021-11-10
If you want all galleries with too many Ugly ratings be automatically removed, contact @Creator and suggest it.
RandonGuy (High Knight)
Report
Reply
2021-11-11
I can foresee trolls abusing that to get galleries of decent or average removed. As it is, plenty will vote 1 star on feet others may view differently. Another factor are the "bunion lovers" that love bunions and may miss out on what they like. Finally, I think wikifeet is partially a resource site, a place to look up any celeb and see their feet, good, bad, or ugly. Anyway, there are arguments pro and contra.
Ye Olde Doc (Duke of wikiFeet)
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
2021-11-11
I don't care about having ugly galleries removed (and trust me, '@Creator' doesn't give a damn about what is posted as long as it generates traffic). Ye Olde Doc is right- there is something for everyone; foot admiration is purely subjective. What bothers me is the spirit in which this is done. These posts weren't made for the purpose of giving others the opportunity to admire/enjoy them- they were made for shock value,and I find that to be cruel.
Patriarch (Recruit)
Report
Reply
2021-11-11
@Ye Olde Doc Maybe the feature can be applied by the account that activates it, instead of being system-wide.
RandonGuy (High Knight)
Report
Reply
2021-11-10
Why does this gallery exist
FootSoldier77 (Foot Soldier)
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2021-11-10
If it can exist, then why not?
RandonGuy (High Knight)
Report
Reply
2021-11-10
Wikifeet unlike what it's represented as in it's core is a sexual site, WTF is this
FootSoldier77 (Foot Soldier)
Report
Reply
2021-11-10
@FootSoldier77 You're wrong, and that's why it's allowed. ;)
RandonGuy (High Knight)
Report
Reply
2021-11-10
It's a baseline of what 1 star actually is. Baselines or points of reference at either end gives one a better sense of proportion.
Ye Olde Doc (Duke of wikiFeet)
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
2021-11-11
I tottally disagree. Wikifeet is not a sexual site at all. Wikifeet is an esthetic site.
Ethanol
Report
Reply
2021-11-11
Wikifeet is a RESOURCE !!! Look up a celeb and see their feet!!! What YOU decide to do with that, is up to you. It's a wikipedia for feet, a google image resource for concentrated feet attached to famous (at least to a degree) people.
Ye Olde Doc (Duke of wikiFeet)
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
2021-11-09
Enjoy!
ToothpickTorture (Guardian)
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2021-11-11
The beautiful girl with glasses is Dr. Ebonie Vincent: https://www.wikifeet.com/Ebonie_Vincent
Ethanol
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
2021-11-11
@Ethanol Thanks!
RandonGuy (High Knight)
Report
Reply
2021-11-10
Good grief. If there is a good qualifier for ugly feet, these are the ones.
Revenger (Knight)
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2021-11-10
Why?
Unbalance_2020
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2021-11-10
Why not?
RandonGuy (High Knight)
Report
Reply
2021-11-10
I agree, why. I'm not going to waste a ranking.
SlimJim (Knight)
Report
Reply
- End of comments -