2023-09-26

Perfect example in the difference in rating technique and why starting with 5 stars and deducting for defects is more fair to women featured on WF than starting with 3 and rating up. I agree there is little to go on. Yet zoom in on the photo in another tab. Deena's size 6 feet are not just OK. They appear to be perfection with no apparent flaws. Look at the arch and well defined ball and big toe. How does she deserve 3 stars? If you don't have enough information, don't rate. If you don't see flaws, rate 5 stars.

2023-09-26

I always start at 3 stars - That's where most feet are. I don't want to devalue 5 stars or the unusually great, so a foot has to work up to and be truly unusual to get there. Good feet, even without "defects", can be 3 stars. When they are a cut above but not quite top tier, they earn a 4.