Good hand position 😉

"it's super f****ng weird"

What do you mean the fact she now knows about her wikiFeet please elaborate

Suffice it to say yes, simply, that is what he means. I suggest no elaboration. No reason to get caught in the weeds, and go down a rat hole.

#thepose

From left to right: Charlotte Kemp Muhl, Emily DiDonato, Herieth Paul, Adriana Lima, Jourdan Dunn, and I-Hua Wu. https://www.wikifeet.com/Charlotte_Kemp_Muhl https://www.wikifeet.com/Herieth_Paul (!) https://www.wikifeet.com/Adriana_Lima https://www.wikifeet.com/Jourdan_Dunn

Yep. Great dress and even better legs!

@A-Rex, yes, I know that, and would reject a pic with *only* toe cleavage & no arch, *but* if the vamp of a shoe is low enough, isn't *lots* of toe 'cleavage' really showing TOES (just not the tips of 'em)? If you see lots of boob cleavage, aren't you really seeing part of two BOOBS? (You know, like @Digby/@Dingo!) Not really trying to make a big case for 'toe cleavage' alone, but stating if you've got a pic with huge arch & ample toe cleavage, you're really seeing "Arches and Toes," just not the whole foot, in fact *way* more of it than a lot of 'toe pees' posted on this site that have one or two toes showing from a peep-toe pump peeping out from a long dress or pair of pants!

A worthy issue for next fireside address #my2cents: if nothing else shows *most* (well over 80%) of her toe cleavage must show but others may differ etc.

I say: If it were *my* website, it would. On *this* website, probably not. On *another* website, to quote Metallica, "Nothing Else Matters" to wit: http://toecleavage2.blogspot.com/

So I hereby alter my position: 100% of toe cleavage (although front peep toe is legit) must show so *fin de l'histoire* ;)

She will definitely need warming after this photo shoot. I get the feet end!

plenty to drink AND EAT!!!! :-P