Yeah. She often keeps them pretty clean, and as a fan of natural nails, no complaints here! Lol

For that matter, does she ever paint her nails?

Probably not, but they're pretty sexy even so.

Ikr we want new pics

I don’t remember the video/article or if it was maybe on social media but I remember somewhere she said something about thinking it’s weird that people like her feet and that she was intentionally going to try not to post anything about them/get them in videos

she says here she censors them - https://youtu.be/Ys5SkNQiKBs

Yes you are right

Indeed!

Wikipedia and Google say it's correct

Incorrect information can perpetuate throughout the web. This means that Wikipedia and Google can both be wrong. It's kind of incumbent on @kshanndd to provide the source for the disputed DOB. But this will be the definitive; right from the horses mouth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdYtF8UwBVY She already confirms that Nov 11 is her birthday and at 1:30 confirms the year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqPTh9FHEVQ

Yeh, am gunna need a timestamp lol

Around 1:44:10 is when the segment starts and it ends at 1:44:22 but she is wearing socks till about 1:44:17, also you are probably gonna want to set your playback speed to 0.25 because it is a sped up clip.

AND we get to tag it for @Onan (whom I haven't seen in months?)' #flippingbird He'd *love* the Humiliatrix.com website - most of those girls do that nonstop.

Nice soles!

Do you have a proof she noticed? Did she say this somewhere?

On her googling myself video, she comes to the site.

@DOS- It's posted right down there on this wall. She even quoted a post by @toeloverforever from this comment wall.

@physdude @BackInBlack60 She posted the video in November 2014, ILuvFeet1 posted this 4 months before that. Even I asked him before her Googling Myself video, that's why I asked

If i recall correctly she may have tweeted about it at one point, but I can't really remember it was a little while ago :)

http://youtu.be/Od575ag0nGM 0:51

@Ahmet A Can you please post the video with the real video tag as a separate comment?

She used to dye her hair every couple of weeks but about a month ago she shaved her head for charity so now she's wearing wigs

She's getting rid of it soon :P

xD

Does this count as a #bath pic? We need a call here...

Tough call. Lets look at what we have. She is in a bathtub but no water. She's also not taking a bath so technically no.

@dirt-on-sole - hopefully you're not as dense as @Mojo JoJo, but please see the rather lengthy thread over his video post. Or save yourself some time and just read @BiB's response to him. Thanks!

@dirt-on-sole: The thread @Iluvfeet is referring to is over on Brittani Louise Taylor's wall. Here's the link: http://www.wikifeet.com/Brittani_Taylor

Duh...that sure would make sense. Thanks @T97. :)

@ILF- I wasn't going to *even* try that again! But either mail Eli or make a note for next Fireside Chat that he needs to add or *clarify* (for the denser ones like @Mojo Jojo who can't make a logical inference) in the rules: o All uploaded pictures *OR VIDEOS* must show toes, soles or arches ->(not just *talk* about them, or this site) Maybe he needs separate rules for uploading videos, especially since he said Guild isn't responsible for watching them, only approving the *comments* attached to them [smfh!]

@BiB - way ahead of you...probably first time ever. I already emailed @Creator to take a look at Brittani's wall. @Mop Job is such a dipsh*t, the time he spent responding on the wall could have just been directed to @Creator. SMFH

@dirt you don't have to listen to them. They are just butthurt. You are doing nothing wrong by posting a video. Go ahead and post the video if you want to.

@dirt- Yeah, pay no attention to the two old-time Guild members who have been here since 11/09 and 9/10 and *know* the nuances of the site rules. You just listen to that clueless n00b Topo Gigio there who to my knowledge doesn't participate in Guild Chat or 'Fireside Chats' with the Admin/Site Owner. Truth be told, there's so much garbage on the walls it doesn't matter anyway, it's just that when someone clicks on a video embed here they EXPECT to see FEET in it somewhere, not just some idiot babbling for four minutes about her YouTube channel and how she's going to Google herself next time to find 'some foot fetish site' with her pictures on it. Now, if she *shows them off* on that next show, entirely different story.

@DoS - it's simple, read our explanations to @Mop Job, they all make sense compared to his, there's no rule that says you can't so it has to be acceptable. If @Mop Job is so right, why is he so afraid to contact the @Creator of this site? Because he'll get the final word that's he's wrong, that's why! In his mind, he's thinking, the more users I get doing it my way, the more right I'll be. That kind of logic is ass-backward.

In addition @MoJo has no respect for people who have been here far longer and understand how to Interpert the site guidelines SMH :)

What I don't get is why @BlowJo had to write novels on two or three walls about a minor point, the difference between merely pasting a link in a comment and embedding one. That was *all* I was talking about. Link away in comments, and it'll either be accepted or rejected just like any other comment. But if it's *embedded* it's supposed to SHOW feet and be time-indexed to WHERE the feet are SHOWN in the video.

@BIB so writing a paragraph is a novel now? All I asked was for you to show me where it says that. I just wanted some documentation. But instead you got butthurt, and gave me your interpretation of what you think the rules should be. That's not what I asked for. I don't care about what you think it's supposed to be. If I want to embed a video of a celeb talking about wikifeet on thier page, there's no rule that says I'm in the wrong.

@Mojo- I'm not 'butthurt' at all. I *told* you that you were correct there is no *written* rule about it... yet. But since about four of us have written the site admin for clarification of a rule we've always 'understood' to be implicit by common sense and 'passed along' from other old-timers here, there probably *will* be a written rule. But try this... Go to the video page, and *other* than the three we're discussing here (yours, dirt's and mine), I *challenge* you to find a video there that doesn't have feet showing in it. It's a foot appreciation site, and I'm pretty sure the owner/admin wants only embedded videos OF FEET. That's all I'm saying. But no, I'm not butthurt - fact is, I really don't give a shit. I was just *trying* to educate you and keep clutter off the walls, but we've all ended up cluttering two of them more than if I'd never said a word. So I *won't* anymore until we hear back from Eli on the subject via e-mail or in the 12/1 live chat. End of story. Post all you want. I'm done.

She is so mesmerizingly beautiful with her red head in this video that I dont even care there's no feet.

@Challen- I hear that! Don't like her with in 'no hair' pics though. @Mojo- I got a reply from @Creator: "I'd rather have all posted videos feature actual feet and not talks about feet or wikiFeet." He did agree that the rules aren't clear, and suggested we post a Guild Poll about it to amend the 'official' rule. As I told you, it was just always sort of a 'tradition' or 'understood' that we only post *links* to videos unless they actually have foot content. That's really all I was saying, and if you'll notice my original comment that set you off, I'd said, "We're really not supposed to..." but didn't want to make a big deal of it, and didn't say, "You broke a rule, shouldn't have posted this, ought to be reported and banned" etc. etc. It was more or less just a cautionary *suggestion* and sorry it turned into all this crap. Cool? I or @ILF or someone will post a Guild Poll about it and we'll either limit it to 'feet showing' or open it up to 'anything goes' on videos, depending on what members want.

She didn't say it was *this* site... just a foot site. There are a bunch, including a Twitter devoted just to her feet.

It was from a video she did with cherry doing things from the kama sutra but got removed for obvious reasons

The video is private now, I found a (lower quality) re-hosted copy here: http://tune.pk/video/4228202/two-girls-attempt-kama-sutra

Excellent!

Did someone mention Bath tubs? lol