Françoise Yip

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Wheelz
Member since 03/2016
♛7

2020-07-16 16:53:50

damn she is gorgeous

Levendi
Member since 11/2014
♛3

2014-11-27 23:08:41

Works for me!!!!!!!!!!

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

tweety
Member since 01/2011
♛9

2014-05-25 03:14:52

@moebius I don't upload pics as I'm not bright enough on computer skills to do so Hell that's why my aviatar is blank That being said I said this a long time ago and I was still accepted as a fellow foot lover all the GREAT UPLOADERS accepted me if you were to limit the reject/approve people like myself might feel "second class" and leave the site I listen and respect all uploaders and occasionally when they say "JUMP" I ask how high point is this is a colllabrative site ALL INCLUSIVE!!! Many here know me and respect me as I do them it's just wrong to exclude people on na collaborative site I only report pics when asked or in duplicates when 1 is better than the other my 2 cents worth a penny!!!

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛69

2014-05-25 02:44:48

@moebius- We have discussed this issue here ad nauseam for years, and more recently extensively in Guild Chat (and on walls). We had polls in Guild and voted. We e-mailed the admin. He is aware of the issues. He recently made some 'quick fix' improvements to the reporting system, with a view to more improvements as soon as he is able. But if you have good suggestions, please send them to the Admins, Eli or Gil.

moebius
Member since 02/2014
♛5

2014-05-25 02:42:01

@Celaris

I propose that only accounts which have uploaded a certain minimum number of pictures have the authority to remove pictures. An uploader has an incentive to be fair, as he would do to others' uploads as he would wish others to do to his uploads. In contrast, non-uploaders have no uploads of their own which are at stake, so why should they be trusted to decide what happens to other people's uploads? Please consider it.

Toe
Member since 05/2012
♛29

2014-05-25 02:14:27

@moebius - May I suggest contacting the site admin via the Contact button above and express your concerns. While we may only police the system. It is in fact, the owner's system. He is the only one that can make changes, but he must hear from the people.

Celaris
Member since 04/2014

2014-05-25 02:10:25

@moebius. You have to remember, every new account is accepted into the guild. Only those who have 500 guild exp can talk in guild chat. Your picture was judged by who knows how many people that visit this site.

moebius
Member since 02/2014
♛5

2014-05-25 02:00:52

@Celaris

I agree that anyone should be able to initially report a picture, but after that it should preferably be the job of the Guild to decide on how to react to the report. Allowing pictures to be removed without first going through the Guild is hazardous, as this could allow vandals to remove basically any picture they choose, with nobody else aware it is going on unless we constantly check every gallery. In this case I saw my picture was removed because of the small total number of pictures here, but in galleries with hundreds of pictures it would be hard to even notice that some pictures (especially older pictures) have been removed.

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛69

2014-05-25 01:55:24

I liked the cosplay ones of Adrianne Curry, taken on a public street, that got booted from here.

TheRealLoverBoy1
Member since 10/2012
♛92

2014-05-25 01:51:53

@Moebius wrote: "This picture is in fact a movie poster designed to be posted in public (and the movie itself is not porn), so it seems ironic that a picture acceptable for public viewing is unacceptable here." Interesting but we are indeed *here*.

Celaris
Member since 04/2014

2014-05-25 01:29:49

@moebius. Sadly, every system has its flaws. Hope you have better luck in the future.

Iluvfeet
Member since 11/2009
♛3

2014-05-25 01:25:28

@moebius - that's the problem with the reporting system here. It's in the hands of anyone visiting this site, including people who don't know or read the guidelines. The Guild tries but can't guarantee consistency.

moebius
Member since 02/2014
♛5

2014-05-25 01:17:49

@ Celaris

Thanks for the response.

I changed the format to JPG before uploading, so I doubt that's the problem.
I understand she is not clothed, but her private parts are not visible. This picture is in fact a movie poster designed to be posted in public (and the movie itself is not porn), so it seems ironic that a picture acceptable for public viewing is unacceptable here.

But if my picture is unacceptable here, then I would have to believe that pictures such as this one (which has been around since 2010!):

http://pics.wikifeet.com/Lesley-Anne-Down-Feet-165793.jpg

should also be unacceptable here on the same grounds. I am willing to follow any standard, as long as it is applied consistently.

Celaris
Member since 04/2014

2014-05-25 00:49:44

@moebius. A rejection can happen for several reasons. Sexually explicit is one or a duplicate. The third reason is low quality. Format may also play into it but I am unsure. Judging by the link I would say that the fact she is naked played a roll in its rejection.

Never give up. We are thankful for any uploader.

moebius
Member since 02/2014
♛5

2014-05-25 00:38:52

Here is the original picture, for reference:

http://img.docstoccdn.com/thumb/orig/91203503.png

moebius
Member since 02/2014
♛5

2014-05-24 22:47:01

Can someone tell me why the picture I recently uploaded here was removed?