I tried to find video...can someone post the link that has her scrolling through her WF pages?

I don't know if it's still online, but I recorded it from 'Instagram.' Women mention the site now and then. Nice to see someone actually viewing it. I maintain that she's probably the most beautiful woman I've ever seen, but I think that her feet are just okay.

Not perfect but, a lot to like about this Cutie...

a "potential" bunion is not a bunion. We have many potentials early in life, some more than others, lol... True that some types of feet, especially longer shapes have more potential for bunion formation, and, of course, wearing some shoes can make that happen over time. Soft super wide and short toed Fred Flintstone Feet might have less potential for bunion,

I'm right there with you, she is fantastic. Also agree w/@YOD, regarding "potential". This lady would be a keeper for me.

That's Franzy Staedter. Lyndon's stylist. https://www.wikifeet.com/Franzy_Staedter

Thanks @Dandyno, much appreciated!

Who's the girl on the right?

https://www.wikifeet.com/watch/2197298_Katrina_Bowden

She looked great on NCIS 💚🔥🔥🔥😍

Good question ! I couldn’t find anything either

See RL35's post above? didn't you read the whole feed?

Wrong!

not quite, but they are pretty - imo ofc!

lmfao...Wow, didn't see that one coming...excuse me, I'm going to find "this way"...

That arch is fine so is the rest of Lyndon smiths feet and the rest of her too!

yes, they are incredible!

Beautiful arch

Well said.

Your comment made me look more closely. This woman is a beauty! I LOVE those toes!

same here, i was like "hmm lemme see.. OH WOW"

I don't understand why it is important that your photo comes from twitter. I'm talking about quality. your picture has a higher resolution but it's blurry and has a worse quality. my pic is sharper, IMHO. download them and confront them.

I mention that it's from twitter: 1. in order to mention its source (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CmnulZkWEAAa1-f.jpg:large), that it's original, i.e. it's not a resize I've found, and I haven't edited it neither. 2. because in instagram the largest image resolution are 1080x1349 while in twitter the largest are 2048x2048 (check e.g. the 6 newest pics in http://www.wikifeet.com/Apostolia_Zoi, which are updates uploaded by me, all from twitter) replacing the relevant duplicates from instagram. We agree to disagree. There's nothing more to say.

Who cares? Either way, she's got #bluetoes and #OreoMegaStuffCookies

i know that it's an original pic but to me it's useless to always remind me the resolution of the pic, i don't care, because resolution means nothing in some cases. i disagree i'm sorry, but it's not the end of the world, no problem, it's just a pic, i'll keep my pic in my pc because i think is better. what interested me highlight was just being careful before report as duplicate a pic just because as minor resolution, because in some cases, a pic with minor resolution can has better quality and it was this the case, IMHO. but i see that my pic has been removed so i think the others don't care to check the quality of pics.

OK, I wasn't going to take sides but here we go. The rule says, "When reporting a duplicate picture, make sure you report the lesser quality one and not the better copy. Please don't rely on resolution alone and check the actual pictures." I've looked at both photos side by side. At "slideshow view" size (on 24" Hi-Def monitor), they are virtually identical and indistinguishable in any way. There is absolutely no variation in clarity nor color. When enlarged to full size, @Silver may be correct that the larger one (1638 x 2048 id. 2463404) is very slightly less sharp, and I feel as if it's just because of the larger resolution. Real world on this site, most users ignore that rule and just go with 'bigger is better' whether it is or not. Here they both are... take your pic(k)! http://pics.wikifeet.com/Lyndon-Smith-Feet-2314701.jpg http://pics.wikifeet.com/Lyndon-Smith-Feet-2463404.jpg

also Mr Hate said that I'm right in private message and it is important to me. But I repeat I do not care the individual photo, it is not a problem. my post was just to highlight the importance of comparing photos before reporting, for the future, as a guide for all users. Really i've nothing against you Graycat.

Yeah, as I said, sadly most users ONLY look at resolution, not quality. They should heed what they tell their girlfriends... "It's not just the size that matters!"

@Silver89 After uploading in wikifeet lots and lots of twitter images so far, I may say that, whenever I find the same image in both twitter and instagram, I've noticed that (almost) always the (larger) image from twitter is of better quality too (e.g. Apostolia Zoi's page). In this case I found that it's of equal quality while larger. Whenever I upload an update to an existing image in wikifeet I always try them to be of better quality - not of larger resolution just for the sake of numbers. But, since Mr Hate and BiB60 agree with you that your upload is the one that should remain, it's 3 against 1, so, sorry about this and I ask the GKs to restore yours and delete mine, if possible, please.

@graycat your honesty is admirable. it is clear that you are a great user that compares the quality of photos before upload. I hope that everyone else take example from you. thank you for the civil clarification.

You like looking at feet,but do you like feet looking at you?

It's weird when they stare back!

@alien- FOUND 'EM!!!

I'm here.Whoa!