Where is it from?

film ?

Google knows. Seriously, am I the only user here who has the Google on my computer? Bigger myster- Why would anyone *want* to know that? Other two are ugly chicks with uglier shoes. Ewww. Caption:NEW YORK, NY - SEPTEMBER 08: (L-R) Actress Kat Graham, fashion designer Katty Xiomara, and actress Sammi Hanratty attend the Katty Xiomara Runway Show at the Nolcha Fashion Week New York Spring Collections 2015 during NY Fashion Week at Eyebeam 540 West 21st Street on September 8, 2014 in New York City. (Photo by Brian Ach/Getty Images for Nolcha Fashion Week) "Snark is my middle name."

http://www.wikifeet.com/Katerina_Graham - - In case you have trouble finding "Kat" @BIB Serious though, what is this Google people have been talking about? I have goggles. What do I need with some stinking Googles?

@Toe - I dunno, still figuring out this new craze. I think someone said something about Search Injuns? Is that a new tribe? We don't even have a territory for 'em in Oklahoma - maybe one of those Southwest Tribes? California, maybe?

Also, what the hell is this "Your Tube" thing ever'body's been talking 'bout? If I want a tube, all I gotta do is walk on down to the local junkyard and search through the big-a$$ collection they got going there!! Tubes for ever'body!! ;)

goggles r kool, as far as tubes go... them too, unless there is a steak after it :0 !

I searched on google before asking, since I couldn't find this pic. Plus, Kat Graham ain't ugly.

@maxpower - Yeah, it *was* a sort of tough one to track down, but I'm a pretty good researcher. Kat isn't ugly, but those shoes she's got there *surely* are!

Those shoe heels are much too high for Sammi's cute, young tootsies - best warranty for hammer toes.

Lmao. The fool thinks Kat Graham is ugly. We know what that's all about.

Feet need to be pretty bad to get even 4 stars around here.

What exactly is wrong with them? Nearly perfect to me.

Not the best view but it looks like a big fat substantial one... Meaty, worthy of closer investigation

ig story video

i can upload only 1 cap. the others have been uploaded and already removed because the guy has handcuffs and here is bondage and AC

Seems odd that its against rules for a socked guy to be in handcuffs when its acceptable to upload pics of her handcuffed & bloody as well as a guy in shoes that is handcuffed.

I found this site much more enjoyable once I accepted the notion of 'not my site, not my rules'. There are plenty of issues and places on the internet to draw your line in the sand and fight for change. But you've been here a while so I'm not telling you anything you don't already know.

Seems kinda strange for anyone to report those pics since that scene has nothing to do with sex and bondage. But I guess those who reported it haven't seen the scene..

As far as I can tell the scene in context is immaterial. The rules on WF content are pretty clear and there is not a lot of latitude. I don't agree with all of them but they are what they are. I'm not making excuses for reporting anything here because I didn't. I can turn a blind eye but once someone reports something, I will usually justify it if it falls within the site rules.

before uploaded the pics i asked to a mod and those pics can stay because i cropped the part with the guy and the handcuffs, but 3251970 and 3251971 show handcuffs and i think will be removed

Right you are silver for this site context of the movie does not count!

I get what you are saying, but it's all really up to individual interpretation in cases like these. No right or wrong. If one should report every pic that was considered slightly edgy we'd lose a looot of content, haha. Oh well.

I get the whole "not my site, not my rules" thing and it is what it is and all that. But I think it's possible to at least try and not make things worse. If I see a report that 100% isn't justified, I'll click not justified. Usually this is for stuff like "low quality" where we have certain users who are doing their part just to be annoying and get perfectly acceptable pictures removed. But Slimjim over here says he'll justify a pic even if he doesn't agree with it. Like....you know you could just NOT hit justify, right? I understand AFAIK it's against the rules to try and unjustify a reported pic if it is indeed justified. But what about just trying to not make things worse by just ignoring the report? At least then the pic might be around for that much longer. If I see a report I don't agree with, even if it's justified, I just won't contribute to justifying it. And like others have said, there's pictures of her and other girls handcuffed, tied up and beaten and what not on here. So no the rules aren't "pretty clear".

@Mishu777...you're preaching to the choir my friend. The rules are not clear, they stay the same but seem to be enforced at random. Not complaining just an observation.

5'1" or 155 cm

Im assuming Sammi is on the left. She says it's so little; but really the one on the right is huge right?

Her feet are ok. She's adorable though!!