wFicons Created with Bez
The collaborative celebrity feet website

Vanessa Kelly's Feet

Actress | Producer
wikiFeet Score:
4.69 Stars
Tap to rate
Rating distribution
Total votes: 70
Celeb's IMDb page
Birth date: 1974-02-25
Birthplace: Australia
Height: [ Not set ]
Shoe size: 10 US
Photos
Videos
Mentions
Hands (beta)

Similar feet

If you liked this page, you may want to check out:

Vidhi Yadav

Payton Ramolla

Bella Sommers

SOME SPACER

Comment section

For discussions over symmetry and aesthetics. Keep it classy, be respectful, avoid political topics.
2018-09-20
Very nice
BrutonGaster (Foot Soldier)
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2014-08-17
Superb woman with yummy feet
Grik (Foot Soldier)
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2014-07-09
@DocStrangelove... Rather don't edit out nudity, here that's still considered A/C and thus won't help at all.
Pinchy69 (Duke of wikiFeet)
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2014-07-09
@Doc- Yes, please do yourself a favor and go to the site's Home Page, and look for a small link near top right "Site Guidelines" and review those. Included is this: o WikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked.
BackInBlack60 (Duke of wikiFeet)
Report
Reply
2014-07-09
Ok, thank you to you both for your advices!
DocStrangelove (Recruit)
Rated: ★★★★★
Report
Reply
2014-07-09
Yes !
toeloverforever (Commander)
Rated: ★★★★
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2014-07-09
this is nice
toeloverforever (Commander)
Rated: ★★★★
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2014-07-09
If you missed it, the following photos will be removed for A/C, but they were awesome: #1391578, 1391580, 1391593 & 1391594. Enjoy!
BackInBlack60 (Duke of wikiFeet)
Report
Reply
Toe down commentToe up comment
2014-07-09
I can understand 1391593 & 1391594, because there were some breasts visible in transparency, but I don't understand #1391578: there were no feminine attributes showing at all!
DocStrangelove (Recruit)
Rated: ★★★★★
Report
Reply
2014-07-09
On #1391578, I was on the fence about it, but it is 'nudity' in a way, and more than that, there was underboob showing on her right breast under the flower, and that's one of @Creator's 'unwritten' adult content rules... "No underboob, no sideboob." Shame, as I like 'em both and *all* those pic were GOLD as @Grik said. I posted the numbers so interested parties can still access them. Hopefully we can find other pics to add to the gallery of this beauty!
BackInBlack60 (Duke of wikiFeet)
Report
Reply
- End of comments -