Hate 'em... Why? Once on, those overly complicated things don't come off. I also like shoeplay which will always be absent with these. They just stay on.

A tragic waste

💜

Buddy, I got some bad news.

Gone too soon for sure.

Sweet beautiful girl

Honestly, picture is with normal quality, but you can't see cleer her feet

In this one

It's fine to me. There are many photos with worse quality in other galleries

normal quality

I don't think it matters what the quality of the entire photo is; it's about how much quality there is on the feet in the photo. A super high-res photo doesn't mean squat if the feet are a mile away, or so shaded in the shot they look like a 256-color GIF.

Curves, this is exactly the way I see it. How useful is the pic as a foot pic for this site or the gallery??? (smaller galleries, dead or old celebrities get more leeway as new pics unlikely)... If the pic is NOT NFS, but barely shows feet, it can have reasonable resolution but if the blow-up view still remains marginal, it might become "Poor Quality" to me, no matter how great the camera and lens was used.

This particular pic is marginal - I'd likely keep it given that she is gone and great new pics in number are unlikely to arrive here. If the gallery was bigger and expanding of a new and active starlet, I'd more likely vote PQ given the darkness and poor view

I didn't realize she's gone, that's so sad, and I definitely agree with the rule that the standards should be applied more or less rigorously based on the availability of photos.

Sorry, it's never gonna happen. No new photos will ever exist.

they upload rare pics when they can be found. it'll be 6 years soon.

Technically not a foot fetish website according to its Creator, Owner & Webmaster: https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/celebrity-feet-wikifeet But, it's easy to see your point.

Would it be the feet that makes people think that???

Dang, that MUST be it! Never considered that possibility! ;)

weither or not this is a site for foot fetishists, if you loved her for her personality and talent aswel as beauty then yes. caring for someone has no specific location

That's how I feel about it. If you admired the person, their life & talents, when they were living, what's the harm in leaving an RIP here, or anywhere else? Also, though some disagree, I see no harm in us old guys reminiscing about the classic beauties of our past and our youth who are past the grass now, like Ingrid Bergman, Audrey Hepburn, Bette Davis, Katharine Hepburn, Elizabeth Taylor, Judy Garland, Grace Kelly, Vivien Leigh, Marilyn Monroe, Farrah Fawcett, and a host of others. And a hearty 'Requiescat In Pace' to them all.

@BackInBlack60 I agree with Eli. This is not a foot fetish website. :)

I am a huge fan of Christina's work. I was heartbroken when she was murdered. I regularly go back to her music and weep. I don't come to her page anymore but I wouldn't want it to be shut down. It serves as a bizarre little shrine to her in some way. I know not everyone will see it that way but I feel like this site gives her a little light that allows her beauty to continue to shine.

for me it depends on how someone died. feels wrong to get off on a woman who died at the hands of someone else. she was murdered.

Yes, so was Nicole Brown Simpson, but she also has an active gallery. One created years after she was murdered. Besides, does it really matter how she died? "She doesn't deserve to be here because someone killed her"? That seems quite unfair. One can indeed argue it's disrespectful, but then again one can say the same about a celebrity that died from natural causes as well. I personally don't think there's anything disrespectful or wrong in appreciating beauty, and she had loads of that. If there's a new policy to close the galleries of dead celebrities then sure, go ahead. I however don't think galleries like this one should be treated any different than the rest.

Here’s the deal for me... if this were a site that allowed vulgar comments, then having galleries of the deceased would be in poor taste. But since we curate comments, and don’t allow vulgar and distasteful comments, having galleries for deceased women is fine for me.

I approved your comment, even though I do not agree with it. I don't think keeping this gallery open is a sign of disrespect to her, but a testament of her beauty. Nevertheless, may she rest in peace.

I have to agree with @Rad on this. may she rest in peace.

THIS CHILD TAKEN TOO YOUNG NO DOUBT: BUT LETS KEEP HER HERE WHERE SHE'LL BE REMEMBERED FONDLY. WHILE THE S O B THAT KILLED HER ( TO REMAIN NAMELESS ) BURNS IN HELL FORGOTTEN

I don't want it my son throw away my picture like garbage and forget me when I pass away.

We are not her family, we're just getting turned on by her pictures. And I'm gonna assume you don't want your to do that with your picture when yo're gonna. Personally, I don't care, I'm just saying these justifications are dumb.

all i'm saying is that it's disrespectful to have fantasies about a girl who passed away by the hand of a total lunatic. believe me i like her feet, love her work as a singer, but i highly respect her and believe since she is gone she should be left to rest in peace.

Is it disrespect that we have galleries for Marilyn Monroe, Natalie Wood, Ava Gardner,Betty Page? What these galleries are about is reverence. And that is what this page, her killer tried to snuff out everything about Christina Grimmie, her talent, her beauty, her effervescent personality, why should we finish his job? Of course, don't have sexual fantasies about her, but for many of us these galleries are about more than just the sexual (after all adult content is banned), they are about a record of beauty. By those standards this girl who was beautiful both inside and out deserves to be here.

no @feets of strength but they didn't die by the hands of another person.

@WorMartiN what do you mean?

Natalie Wood's death is kinda suspicious.

So why have you not complained on Sharon Tate's gallery as she was murdered also? You've also got Jill Dando and Lana Clarkson. You're not exactly consistent in this pretence of righteousness. How about Rebecca Gayheart as she killed a child?

@Gunner those names aren't familiar by me, i don't know them but i do think if someone passed away due to murder or whom committed murder shouldn't be here on this platform anymore.

If we begin to remove celebrities when they are deceased there would be about 40% less galleries here, the sex symbols of the past Marilyn Monroe (suicide), Natalie Wood (drowning/ murder?)and so many others would be gone. Christina Grimmie was an effervescent, talented young woman full of life. Why don't you want her to be celebrated? Why do you want her to be forgotten? Remember this is not a porn site but is a site honoring the beauty of celebrities.

All joking aside, if we start removing galleries because someone was killed by someone else, how long will it be before someone says we should also remove the galleries of women who committed suicide? Someone could say something like, "She was tormented, so we should leave her in peace." And then we can start removing galleries of people who accidentally overdosed on drugs or drank themselves to death and likewise say, "They were troubled. We should leave them in peace." Everyone dies. The disturbing way this poor girl died may make it impossible or unpleasant for you to fantasize about her. If so, the solution is simple: Don't try to fantasize about her. And if you're troubled about her having a gallery here, avoid this gallery.

While I can't agree with killing the page, I can agree about living and letting die. It wasn't until I saw the comments that I figured that she was dead and refrained from seeing the gallery as a whole. If you were a true fan, you're welcome to remember and cherish her, but please always keep certain morality in check.

Only if those streets lead to my underwear.

Yes! R.I.P Angel.....

HERE HERE

HAD!, RIP

Is that like Mot Gilk? Or...