I like them too.

Women with Morton’s Toe make excellent bedfellows.

Morton's toe? My god, SMH. Such shallow, delusional people on this site. She is one of the most beautiful people on Earth and yet people think they can judge her. I almost feel like the rating system on this site is pointless. Everybody likes different stuff. The ratings are not that accurate because of it.

@SmileyMagician Yet... you ranked her anyway, right? 😉

I'm just amused by the language, "squigglers"... LOL, otherwise no need for anyone to take any stray comment so seriously.

@SmileyMagician people like you make me feel ashamed of liking feet, out of all the things u can gatekeep this bothers u. eughhh

Rachel can't get a break. Some say she has bunions, squigglers, and mortons. They're pretty sexy though...wish we had more pics of her in those shoes...

@SmileyMagician You acknowledge that rating feet is purely subjective and in the eye of the beholder ("Everybody liked different stuff") and in the very next breath you say "The ratings are not that accurate because of it", which is a total contradiction. The fact is that the ratings can only be 100% accurate, precisely because they are purely subjective. You having a differing opinion about a rating does not make that rating inaccurate. As for my own personal subjective rating of Rachel McAdams' feet, I give her a 100% accurate 4 because while they are very nice they are also a bit beefy and she very rarely paints her toenails.

Months later, I'm still hunting "squigglers" -- haha

Ofc people are shallow on this site thats used to rate women on looks...

@SmileyMagician You can't seriously be accusing anyone of being shallow on a website solely (no pun intended) dedicated to rating women's feet, right? Because that would be ridiculous, so there's no way you're doing that. As driver008 said, the very fact that the site aggregates purely subjective ratings from whoever rates them is what gives them legitimacy. It's why the heavy-hitters like Emma Stone and others of her level have 5-stars rated in an overwhelming majority of cases. I definitely think McAdams have 5-star feet now, but I'm seeing hints of potential bunions (due to how her big toes are starting to turn into her other toes), but the toes are lovely, the arches are beautiful, and the veins are the cherry on top.

Congrats to those who are courteous enough to explain why they have deducted stars.

Frankly, I rate however the hell I want. Our entire lives are spent rating things, including people, and anyone who argues differently is being disingenuous. How or why we chose to rate things the way we do is not always easy to define, and is mostly subjective. People like and dislike things for a myriad of reasons, none of which anyone else has control over. That being said, I can appreciate someone having a different viewpoint and belief, as it just might inform my future decision making process. Maybe. Probably not. Her feet are a 4 - because I said so, lol.

Imo, people who have the deal broken over Morton’s suffer from a failure of imagination

@zzaayttm33 🤦‍♂️ Jesus why do half the people on this site not know what a Mortons toe is? Anyone who thinks she has a Mortons toe just be quiet or look through her gallery before you make false statements. Educate yourselves on what the term means.

You just don't like arches.

All pictures must show the celebrity's arch(es), sole(s) or toe(s) without opaque shoes and socks.

@barefootlover Her arch is being shown without being covered by opaque shoes or socks. Are you mistaking the "or" for an "and"?

The rule does not say withou being covered...it says without. Does reading and interpretation elude you? This site is NOT a shoe site period!! I've been here 13 years going on 14 years. Back in the day when Eli actually cared to weigh in. Tiffany thiessen page would have three times the number of pictures because I used to post everything she ever put up even with heels and clogs and flats showing toe cleavage and they were ALL deemed NO FEET SHOWING.

Well unless we can see her arch in the pic, it’s probably no good ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@barefootlover I'm afraid you'll have to convince a mod (older than you, because you care about it), that we should delete all close-up of toes poking out of opaque footwear, such as flip flops, so he can give your reporting privileges back. Have fun!

Yeah, not to mention that interpretation would rule out all peep toe pics as well, would it not? I mean, I personally hate peep toes, but that's me.

The feet are still showing, big whoop.

If I just see a dark crack, that's not good enough for me, it's a pure shoe pic. This has a bigger gap, it's well lit and close up with good quality, so you can almost climb into the "gap" and I could even see some sole skin and arch, so I'd not delete this unless it was maybe a distance shot (then it might fall into the PQ category). It may not be ideal, but better and more "usable" visible foot acreage (square centimeters lol) than so many red carpet and distance shots. Anyway, we make compromises with all sorts of shoes, and that's my thoughts on a reasonable way to look at it. The "crack" needs to a gap that one can see clearly inside (lit) with at least some sole skin just like peep toes show some toe skin. If not enough, far away, dim, then it's PQ as it's in the border zone of nfs anyway

Just don’t look at the ones you don’t care for

These are fives for sure!!

Yeah I bumped her up to 5 I saw more of her portfolio and there's no doubt 5/5

Greatest paparazzi sole shot ever

Archie Soles!!! Archie Soles!!! Archie Soles!!!

Gorgeous, shapely soles. So hot!

Agreed. Gorgeous.

Kinda perfect everything with these feet!

Okay I didn't see this sole shot at first, my god...yeah I'm upping her to 5 stars

Its a very elegant proportion.

Absolutely my friend. She’s a true barefooted beauty in this pic.

Agree!😍

Absolutely

McSock lol ... and a McPleasant view

They're intensely alluring for sure...

Yes. And Wikilegs, and Wikieyes, and Wikismiles, and…

Her arch is being shown without being covered by opaque shoes or socks. Are you mistaking the "or" for an "and"?

I guess you're not competent in electronics, programming or using spreadsheets. The word "or" means only one of the conditions needs to be met to apply whereas "and" requires all. Her left arch is visible without the shoe obscuring it. She isn't wearing socks either so OR logic would permit this image to be used. This quotation of the rules isn't your hottest take.

A high arch reveals the instep sole, and the elevated top confirms it.

Just enough of toes and arch showing to get the imagination reeling. Nice!

I agree with Jim.

Those arches..

And those legs, and that smile!!!

A razor would have made this picture amazing

Never noticed that before. Some do and some don't 🤷🏼‍♂️ wonder why they don't 🤔

Maybe… but I don’t care!!!

I think the armpit hair make her look more interesting.

Indeed she does....