wFicons Created with Bez
The collaborative celebrity feet website

Dee-Ann Kentish-Rogers's Feet

Actress | Producer
wikiFeet Score:
4.67 Stars
Tap to rate
Rating distribution
Total votes: 18
Celeb's IMDb page
Birth date: 1993-01-13
Birth place: United Kingdom
Height: [ Not set ]
Shoe size: [ Not set ]
Photos
Videos
Mentions
Hands (beta)

SOME SPACER

Comment section

For discussions over symmetry and aesthetics. Keep it classy, be respectful, avoid political topics.
2019-12-28
Her feet are nice but not Gorgeous
sneaky
Rated: ★★★★★
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
It's funny how many people make comments like this but never add the "because...". You are just spouting off that you don't think they are gorgeous without telling us why. I want to know details I'm curious, aren't you? Tell me why. If me and you both like pizza and we both eat at the same restaurant and I say I don't think the pizza is that good and you do wouldn't you fucking ask me why? Lazy review.
Grizzlednutz (Commander)
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
Or maybe we need a scale from 0 to 10. I struggle with 1 to 5 system a lot :)
Quasar Alpha (Foot Soldier)
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
Clearly you do as you rated her feet ugly which is wildly low. Not even subjectively. Calling her feet ugly is objectively just nonsense. If her feet are ugly what the fuck are Oprah's? You are an insane person. Also you didn't even respond to my point. A different scale doesn't replace having some conviction and explanation behind your opinion. Please give us an explanation as to why these are ugly feet.. I honestly am intrigued. I want to understand your reasoning and preference. It would be like those documentaries where they interview serial killers and ask them why they did what they did.
Grizzlednutz (Commander)
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
.... but sneaky rated 5 stars lol
J0k3r (Commander)
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
That is truly insane that anyone would rate her ugly.
Mr DGAF (Commander)
Rated: ★★★★
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
I was responding to Quasar not Sneaky in regards to the ugly rating. My original response was to Sneaky in regards to why they don't deserve a gorgeous rating as compared to just beautiful. This is such a fine line that it requires an explanation. Otherwise it's just a lazy review. It leaves me asking, "ok but WHY?". People for some reason on this site just go "these feet aren't that great meh" and just leave it at that without giving us an explanation. It's sloppy, lazy, and annoying. Have some fucking integrity and conviction, otherwise why even comment? If you are going to tell me that something is nice but not really nice you should be able to give me a reason why, even if it's as simple as "there just aren't enough high quality pics of her feet".
Grizzlednutz (Commander)
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
I will gladly explain.To me perfect feet are those of Emma Stone ,Karen Gillan,Mila Kunis.I always compare all feet here to those three,I look for proportions , if their feet are being taken care of , I look at at least 70% of the photos before giving a score. I did vote 1 indeed , but her feet are far from ugly , If the scale was from 1 to 10 , I wouldn't rate 1. Everyone has their own preference,I believe I am in my right to vote based on my preference and mine alone ? Let's end this here. :)
Quasar Alpha (Foot Soldier)
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
You explained nothing to rationalize why her feet are ugly. All you did was list 3 people with feet you like, which I also happen to like as well and I think most of us would agree are very nice. You then go on to say that you rated her feet ugly even though they are "far from ugly". That is fucking insane. Yeah let's end this here for sure, there is no point trying to converse with an insane person.
Grizzlednutz (Commander)
Report
Reply
2019-12-28
Ooookaaay :D
Quasar Alpha (Foot Soldier)
Rated: ★
Report
Reply
- End of comments -