Eiza González
Go to IMDb page
Feet rating stats (2198 total votes)
1504
beautiful
beautiful
372
nice
nice
196
ok
ok
80
bad
bad
46
ugly
ugly
Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
You Rated: | (click to rate) |
Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts |
Gallery Settings
more info220 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Eiza González's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
2024-05-11 23:04:54 4.5 stars for me! I think she's taking too big a bit on the flat arch. That tattoo is a bigger ding for me because of the size and how unattractive it is, in my opinion. Otherwise, I think she has fantastic feed! She has pretty toes, they are straight and not knobby, she has a great color, and they look good without polish (a big deal to me than many cannot pull off).
|
2024-04-23 05:42:27 Her feet a good but not great. Her arches are average at best. Can’t have great feet without great arches.
|
2024-04-04 13:06:09 Archless flat feet, I'll pass.
|
2024-04-20 08:59:16 Well… bye
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-04-13 01:17:29 She get work with Quentin Tarantino? This looks like a shot from "From Dusk Till Dawn" Selma Hayet!
|
2024-04-13 01:38:53 It's a scene in From Dusk Till Dawn, the series: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3337194/mediaviewer/rm4115728384?ref_=ttmi_mi_all_pbl_482
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-04-13 01:44:50 https://www.wikifeet.com/Salma_Hayek#&gid=1&pid=2116629
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2023-11-08 10:36:27 Yikes! Zero arch on these big fully clodhoppers
|
2024-03-24 10:57:49 Seconded. The ratings system should be changed so that if someone’s a flatfoot it shouldn’t be possjble to give them 5 stars. One star off for fallen arch, one for bunion/hammertoe, so that someone with both deformities could never be rated higher than 3 stars. This would be a good first step towards addressing the rampant confusing of feet and faces around here. You’d think foot lovers would know which end is which.
|
2024-03-24 11:09:31 Why not just have AI rate everyone based off of some algorithm and be done with it? I mean if we are taking people’s personal preferences out of the equation let’s go all out.
|
2024-03-24 11:12:15 @J-Pac I doubt that Eli would limit the ratings to force subjective preferences, and I doubt he would go over thousands of galleries monthly to confirm if they still have these characteristics.
|
2024-03-27 09:54:55 You're missing my point. Personal preference is about big/small, long/short/chubby/boney toes, skin type, nail shapes, veiny/smooth etc and that's all fine and well. But fallen arches, bunions, hammertoes and Morton's toes are *medical conditions*. I'm not suggesting some arbitrary rule here. It's as binary as it gets. It's either a condition/deformity/ailment or it isn't. If your 'subjective preferences' entail a fetish for deformities and/or injuries, you're not even judging things on the same scale as everyone else, and then why have a rating system at all? There's a reason why the Olympics and the Special Olympics are kept separate. People with deformity fetishes are of course free to start their own "WikiLegStumps" and worship bunions and fallen arches to their heart's desire, but they have a vastly different perspective which shouldn't be allowed to contaminate everyone else's quest for most beautiful **healthy** feet.
|
2024-03-27 10:55:03 @J-Pac Again, I doubt that Eli sees that way, but if you think he does, good luck contacting him and "remembering" him that he forgot to make a rule about rating feet since 2008.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2024-04-11 20:24:05 This made me rate 5 stars. Your bias triggered my bias trigger.
|
2024-04-11 20:30:02 @J-Pac: Care to enlighten us on how you came to define Morton's toe as a medical condition, Mate?
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-10-22 23:17:48 Agreed, the tat still sucks though!
|
2024-04-01 23:55:15 Man, starting to question what guys like on this site, 2/5. Super cute lady, but her feet suck!
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2024-03-17 00:14:10 For me, feet three stars. She is pretty with just ok feet.
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2024-03-25 17:03:01 Better rating here. She seems not to take care of her feet. BTW I know Jaque from your avatar! Nice choice!
|
2024-02-02 15:50:17 Good God she's beautiful
|
2023-12-14 22:49:47 That fugly tatoo gives her a negative 5 star rating unfortunately.
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2021-12-20 21:18:41 Na! I’d bet the pics are from before she got it! It is ugly! IMHO
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2021-12-22 22:25:54 No, if you can take a closer look at the right foot, there is the tattoo, they covered it with makeup, these photos are all recent.
|
2021-12-22 22:52:32 Funny the lengths some people go through on covering up after screwing up...
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2022-03-20 05:16:44 In pic 5541662 it looks like she's getting the tattoo removed.
|
2022-10-04 14:03:42 I think you may be right, if you look at picture 107 it looks as if she’s in the process of having it removed. The worst thing would be if she just tried to cover it with makeup for this evening
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2022-12-16 20:44:34 It’s definitely not gone
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-12-16 21:11:59 It could be Photoshop out but it also looks like she a one or two sessions from completing a tattoo removal
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-12-17 15:47:32 She still has the tattoo, the tattoo has not been removed.
|
2022-12-17 15:52:43 It would be awesome if she removed it...
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-10-22 23:26:33 But you can actually see a little bit of it at the top!
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-10-22 23:28:49 I think ur right! Maybe she got tired of some of us being so pissy about it? Still think IMO they look better w/o it!
|
2023-10-14 09:35:46 Very big feet,her shoe size is 40.5 i think
|
2023-06-17 23:02:30 She has very beautiful sexy feet
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2023-03-15 18:11:45 Please be joking...
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-03-15 18:14:31 Wow, a bit drastic, eh?
|
2023-03-15 18:32:22 Hey, now: https://www.wikifeet.com/Jo_Beckwith is pretty fine.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-03-15 23:47:49 There are users who simply get carried away by envy, the admiration of others, and they do not like others to think differently.
If her feet are beautiful, and she made a mistake, and now she has a foot with a tattoo, these are things that happen, don't make it the end of the world. |
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-03-16 00:12:08 Man... People are obviously allowed to have their preferences, but the hate that tattoos get on this website is ridiculous at times.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2023-03-16 00:18:50 @AlphaBetaOmega Agree.
That's why I say, these people see it as if it were the end of the world. Totally out of place. |
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2023-03-16 21:56:37 What does it have to do with envy or admiration of others?
I don't hate all tats, although granted I hate most of those that are some strange blobs of shapes or colors on the top of the foot. People get all kinds of cool tats, even large ones, why are those on tops of feet always so fugly? And this one is among the worst ones, plus the feet aren't even that great to begin with. Dunno what everyone is seeing here. For a Latina, I had high hopes, but eh, nothing extra. Cute girl, feet unremarkable. |
2023-03-16 22:06:37 a little hyperbole in a comment gathered more excitement than needed -- lol
|
2023-03-16 22:21:57 I personally dislike tattoos in general except for bikers, bartenders and ex-military.
|