Feet rating stats (217 total votes)
76
beautiful
beautiful
46
nice
nice
47
ok
ok
29
bad
bad
19
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (nice feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info33 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Fran Townsend's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2023-12-10 21:24:38 Heh heh 😈
|
|
2023-12-10 21:12:58 Sources https://www.instagram.com/p/9UMCMPC_Mk
https://www.instagram.com/p/BDJTlgYi_NB |
|
2017-10-08 14:58:18 This is a perfect example of a celebrity who is fully aware of this site.
|
|
2016-03-21 00:38:06 ONLY ONE PIC SHOWS A FACE IM SKEPTICAL
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-03-20 17:21:20 A beautiful smart Republican who is photogenic with her feet 💓
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2015-09-21 04:08:57 @Sandyfeet...
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2014-12-02 05:40:48 This is easily one of the worst galleries I've come across.
|
|
2014-12-02 14:48:06 Sorry @H sir, I guess too many of us got carried away here lol! ;)
|
|
2014-12-02 14:52:49 Still beats having to look at Oprah.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-06 20:55:41 Hateness, why?
|
|
2014-12-06 20:56:40 @Grik- Duhh! All shoes, and in LQ/MQ.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-06 20:58:31 People keep using this word ...."shoes". WTF are they?!?!
|
|
2014-12-06 20:58:50 yes what are shoes?
|
|
2014-12-06 20:58:56 Yeah. Looks like a shoe catalogue.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-06 21:00:09 Seriously, there are 9-10 pretty good pics. No HR granted, but sufficient to enjoy the view. She has seriously elegant and sexy feet.
|
|
2014-12-06 21:36:43 No kidding. This gallery is awful. This is NOT wikiSHOES people. Trouble is it got out of hand, I know I don't feel like reporting every one of them!
|
|
2014-12-06 21:44:18 Well, first of all *many* of them are 'legal' arch pics. But it'd be nice if there were something else, like some full-body shots showing feet. It'd also be nice to be rich enough to buy the same shoe styles including Louboutins in several different colors, just because.
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2014-12-06 21:50:35 I despise this damn new standard on shoes simply because it shows a square centimeter of foot! An arch, a heel, a big toenail, toe cleavage, it is all nonsense and why some of the more popular celebrities galleries are flooded with 5000 pictures. Makes it a pain in the ass to look through.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-06 21:54:04 Louboutins?!?! I'm guessing that's terminology for when you go to a very dirty and unkempt toilet?!?!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-06 21:59:24 AvJoe, with u 100%. And some of the more ridiculous and mundane Chattage here has involved the "NFS" brigade here. People going ballistic because a pic showing one centimetre of arch or peep toe gets kebabed. Eg K Stewart recently. We have some seriously sick puppies here.
|
|
2014-12-06 22:06:02 @AverageJoe- There is no 'new standard' on shoes. Arch pics have *always* been legal ever since I've been here in 2010. What's new is that we have finally been given a way to protect them from people like you who hate them enough to falsely report them just because they don't like them. As I've said SO many times, it's a collaborative wiki site, NOT any one user's or group of users' personal gallery of "Only what I/we like."
It's a big pain in the ass for *me* to look through 5000 candids to find a decent red carpet or professional studio shot I like, but I do it, and leave all that 'crap' for others because *that* is how it works here, and one man's trash is another man's treasure. Please quit raging at the wall about it. If you don't like it, maybe write the site owner who *wrote* and *enforces* the rule about toes, soles or arches showing and tell him to change it. Before you do, you might consider looking at the Guild Poll of 2014-10-28 on that very subject, and you will see that 50 users with 483k Guild Experience want the site and rules *just* the way it is currently, versus a 'sandals only' or 'barefoot only' site, and almost NO ONE wants the latter (barefoot only). |
|
2014-12-06 22:08:09 @Grik- Screw you, sir. I posted that poll JUST FOR YOU and maybe you should go take a look at the results. You and AverageJoe are in a *very* small minority here on the subject. Suggest you go find a site you like better or start your own. Then you can have exactly what you want. Why don't you head on over to Wikipedia and start deleting all the articles you don't agree with?
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2014-12-06 22:11:28 Excuse me for having an opinion. Protect from "people like me"? WTF?! I don't go around reporting them, so back off with your troll attack on me. I am not the only one who disagrees with you and your damn arch fetish. No need to be a jerk.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-07 05:15:13 I'm getting the popcorn ready gamoto!!!!
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2014-12-07 05:27:15 Well, since it was brought up again...
My point was if the rules allowed entire foot exposure regardless of what kind of shoe, or the lack of, the galleries would not be overrun with pictures. Some of them are ridiculous! You can still see your beloved arches, heels, or whatever. |
|
2014-12-07 05:39:47 And I'll repeat I am responsible for this gallery (with legit pictures) turning out this way (one dimensional) so I will refrain from uploading until I find a full body super HQ upgrade for #1167385 etc thanks.
|
|
2014-12-07 05:43:09 @TRLB1>"I am responsible for this gallery (with legit pictures) turning out this way"
Copy 'n' Paste from zappos.com??? |
|
2014-12-07 05:51:00 Nearly, in retrospect it's *as if* I've been doing exactly just that #liveandlearn.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-07 06:12:04 Hateness...........you started this.......finish it gamoto!
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2014-12-07 06:16:14 Let's end the madness now. Sorry I ever said a damn thing about this gallery.
|
|
2014-09-03 21:29:54 @bill81 - She is doing what she has to do to get the "Foot Party" vote.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-09-03 21:16:28 Great stuff, she's got a very hot twitter for a politician :D
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-05-16 03:36:12 @Tweety, most women's footwear these days are made/dssigned by men (usually very Gay men). WTF would they know gamoto?!?!?! Do they wear them to test them? No! How often do I go out into town and come midnight I am greeted with the site of young girls carrying their tight & ill-fitting Louboutins etc walking around barefoot with dirty feet..........................and.......as agent 86 would say..........LOVING IT!!!!!!!!
|
|
2014-05-14 05:31:45 @Grik Agree what is that weird thing some woman put on? Oh yeah a shoe:)
|
