Feet rating stats (33 total votes)
11
beautiful
beautiful
6
nice
nice
14
ok
ok
1
bad
bad
1
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (nice feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info1 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Jetta Juriansz's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
2022-03-19 16:47:46 LOL clearly person pictured is not 4 years old. A few possibilities, including time stamp wrong if device never set up right, WP etc.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-03-19 17:35:07 Actually, I've seen that '98 mark quite often in many pics throughout the galleries, and I've been wondering about it for years now. I'm sure it's not a time stamp, at least not for the actual year 1998. Probably some technical index?! Any camera/photography specialist around here...?
|
|
2022-05-05 13:37:26 It's a vintage cam app on iPhone
1998 Cam - Vintage Camera |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2022-05-05 13:45:44 Interesting! Here's another example:
https://www.wikifeet.com/Kelsea_Ballerini#&gid=1&pid=4775365 |
