Mandy Kay

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛69

2016-01-19 23:47:25

►Site Rules:
wikiFeet has very strict rules regarding adult content. Edgy picture and suggestive poses could just as well be considered adult content. Cropping or censoring an adult picture doesn't make it ok. Uploading adult content to a gallery will likely get you banned, and the gallery locked.

Clarification from Site Owner/Admin Eli Ozer in an e-mail to an uploader, after Eli personally removed a bunch of pictures of *only feet* in the gallery of a mainstream (not porn) celeb:

"Sometimes pictures give the impression of adult content, even though they aren't. When a picture is cropped to show nothing but skin and give the impression that the girl is naked, or if there's a close-up on feet that give away a weird/porn-like pose, I tend to remove it. I try to look at galleries from the advertisers' point of view (as I depend on them to keep the site going, and they have zero tolerance for edgy content).
If I enter a gallery and get the feeling I've entered an adult site, I start removing pictures until it looks SFW.

So I'm sorry, but I stand behind my decision to remove those pics.
Also, please try to see things my way and avoid from uploading such pics in the future."
~Eli

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛69

2016-01-19 23:49:50

Forgot to add: If you don't quit unreporting stuff that Eli considers A/C, he'll just *lock* the gallery, and that will be that.

In his 50s world, 'A/C' includes any visible sideboob/underboob, and licking of feet or sucking of toes, and as you see above, any 'suggestive pose' which focuses more on sex than feet. There is also a double standard, with rules being *much* more strictly applied in the case of porn stars. Like this.

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Illuminati star
Member since 09/2015
♛5

2016-01-20 00:28:44

Not the moon too!😭😭😭