2025-03-17

I agree that her toes are not her strong points, and from a certain angle, they are even ugly feet. However, her soles make me fall in love, I think they are so perfect that they make up for the rest.

2025-03-20

I agree, her feet are imperfect, but at the same time mesmerizing. I'm not too harsh on her feet because she used to be a ballet dancer, and ballerinas' feet go through a lot.

2025-02-04

They look great there. Compared to other photos

2025-02-12

She did a lot of dance growing up, according to her interviews. That's gonna be rough on anyone's feet. Idt her feet are that bad honestly but she is definitely taking better care of them/giving them more attention, so they look a lot nicer than they used to. Her soles look pretty nice tho imo.

2025-02-12

Soles look quite nice for me too, but some people say 'soles are easy'. I still kinda like them tbh.

2025-02-03

Very long toes are a major variable or risk. They risk being absolutely the most glorious and great, as well as gnarly knotty tangles of horror. So I love long toes but it's dangerous to go by one criteria, especially one with so many possible variables of what can go so right or so wrong.

2025-02-03

well, the same could be said about short toes, they could look delicate or they could look like little weird stubs.

2025-01-19

Gnarly is a cooler word that fits best

2025-01-16

Yeah, next level.

2025-01-16

Tiel varma ❤️

2025-01-15

I thought I was the only one :0

2024-03-07

Lady all but begged Tarantino not to focus on Her Feet in OUATIH. But to no avail. He made them front and center. I think it was about that time She realized the Her feet were going to be getting attention, because since then She has definitely paid more attention to their care and upkeep

2024-03-07

Yeah, I watched that interview too. She sure seems to be taking better care of her feet now. Anyway, I won’t rate them higher for now even if I kinda want to.

2024-03-17

Too many people use the word "objective" as if it makes the rating authoritative and unchallengeable yet they fail to understand what the word actually means. Ratings are ultimately given by personal preference, that makes it subjective and that's OK. Even if you are given a hard list of criteria, those criteria will ultimately be picked based on subjective reasoning. There is nothing wrong with acknowledging your own biases and preferences in matters of taste. The problem comes when people either try to establish opinion as fact or belittle those of a different view.

2024-11-20

*Too many people use the word "objective" as if it makes the rating authoritative and unchallengeable yet they fail to understand what the word actually means* You go on to say: *Ratings are ultimately given by personal preference* Doing the exact thing you accused the 'objective crowd' of doing. The reaility is - there IS an objective standard of beauty within any culture/sub culture. For example - most people will agree that Qualley's feet are prettier than Oprahs, yeet less that Emma Stone's. However, we have personal biases - the woman themselves being one, having preference for longer toes being another, etc. It's akin to an 'extra layer' on the objective base. There are outliers of course. Some people just like banged up feet. Some people like 6 toes. But these are an exceptions to the rule. Therefore, it is a mixture of objective and subjective reasoning. The problem comes when people ignore the objective and make is purely subjective, which for the majority isn't the case - as we can see from the ratings, which are mostly congruent with my point. I do agree - allow people to like what they like, but also to challenge bollocks too. In this case, those who ignore the subjective component, which has a comparative element too.

2024-11-20

@GallowsReach There is no objective standard for beauty no matter how badly you want that to be the case. Beauty can't be quantified or defined as a scientific fact. The closest thing to objectivity would be consensus and there are always outliers because everyone has their own opinion. Currently her rating stands at 4.77 stars. I gave her four, you gave her three. Neither of us are right or wrong.

2024-11-20

I agree 100%, @just1peek 👍

2024-12-03

Her feet absolutely are not beautiful in the classic sense. But in some way they turn me on despite they are not what I would rate as beautiful. Maybe there are two reasons for this: Her mother always has been a flawless beautiful woman and even in younger years she had this special elegance. Margaret Qualley affects me like the kind of young women we all knew from school: Precocious, seemingly self confident,... that kind of young woman who doesn't (need to) take care of her appearance but somehow has a mysterious kind of natural raw beauty and somehow almost every young man wants to be with her. I hope some of you could understand what I want to say. She is like that kind of girl who always has a(n) (older) boy by her side and often many of them in a short time but despite of this you just couldn't rate her a bi..h because she has this natural sublime thing... .

2024-12-03

LivingDaydream77, I cannot say I understand it fully, but I appreciate and find your explanation interesting. Everyone is different. And it's really cool that you are able to know yourself and your own inner cues, triggers or turn-ons especially when you recognize them to be aside from what you would call "beautiful in the classic sense" as you say. In the end, what works for you is the only thing that matters. It also means that there is someone for everyone, which is a good thing.

2024-12-24

Why would one try to be objective? This is all about subjectivity, if not full-bore je ne sais quoi. This leads to strange situations where men list this or that descriptive lines like a catalog of things wrong, all of which I find as enhancements, not detriments. This is not simpering behavior but, hehe, objective observation of feelings, a correct use of that term. In any case, people are hundreds of times more likely to go on the Internet and complain than praise. Just remember too many complaints, and women cover up their feet, for career reasons if nothing else. Avoid complaints if possible, as some day it may be your hunny suddenly wearing only snowmobile boots to a red carpet.

2023-08-04

Ironically, you chose one of her better pics.

2023-12-16

Feet are rated like fine art. People will judge them as they strike them in a complex context rather than a unidimensional one you may refer as "objective".

2024-10-31

I'm glad someone has come to their senses. She's stunning from head to ankle.

2024-11-11

These are objectively bad feet (IMO).

2024-09-14

Stellar feetz, glad her star is rising big time!

2024-03-26

Non, non. Vous ne pouvez pas dire cela sans preuves pour étayer votre affirmation, inacceptable.

2024-03-27

Si, si je peux. Je viens juste de le faire

2024-03-27

Oui tu l'as fait et tu as tort

2024-03-31

Where is this pic from?

2024-03-31

@flowerfooted Source from a couple comments below: "from Drive-Away Dolls with Geraldine Viswanathan"

2024-06-11

Here Margaret's foot looks significantly bigger than the other girl's

2024-06-11

I currently have her at 2 stars, and standing next to these very nice feet with the cute painted toes is not helping her score. For now, I'm staying with the 2-star rating.

2024-03-30

Drive-Away Dolls

2024-03-28

Laisser il aller déjà.

2024-03-13

Not her feet unfortunately...

2024-03-13

and you have proof of what you say, right? you know, when you report a pic you should post a proof

2024-03-13

Do you find them even remotely similiar to her feet? :D Length of individual toes, shape, everything is different. I don't think there is a pair of feet that is easier to distinguish than Margaret Qualley lol. It's obviously a feet double, but if someone needs proof of that...

2024-03-13

here the photos are not removed for assumptions

2024-03-13

I don't think either of those are the feet of Margaret Qualley like others have stated.

2024-03-13

then find a proof, like an article where she says they used a stunt double, who claims must provide a proof, otherwise have respect for who download 20 GB of 4K movie and use his time to check it and upload original 4K caps that you want to remove because you assume it's not her

2024-03-13

OK so you can post photos of random persons feet and it won't be removed because you don't have a written statement from Margaret Qualley that they are not hers... got it ;)

2024-03-13

lol no, there is a difference from random pics on internet and original caps that come from a movie with a scene where there is margaret qualley who takes a shower, you haven't even seen the movie...

2024-03-13

Not to mention Margaret has got a tattoo on her left calf, and it's not there :) Sure, the could have removed it digitally for whatever reason, but I don't see the point.

2024-03-14

tatoo can be removed, for example riley keough in daisy jones every day had to do 2 hours of makeup only to remove tattos in every part of her body, feet included, there is the interview... btw yes could be a stunt double or not but we can't be sure at 100% until we don't have a proof, btw if the pic is WP will be removed don't worry, it's not a problem to me, who claims this with no proof will take the responsibility

2024-03-14

Nine times out of ten, when an actor is seen from behind or there's a close-up of their hands, etc., it's a body double, as they're cheaper.

2024-03-14

Enough already about body doubles. Report it if you have proof. I don't see any of you making this argument on Geraldine Viswanathan's page.

2024-02-16

wat

2024-01-22

Just photographed from better vantage points, but I like her weird feet, same with Brie Larson