Agree, not on topic with a small portion of 1 toe!

Yes, but you can see her toe. Besides, there are only a dozen or so pics. In time there will be enough photos here that it can be removed as poor quality.

Tiny nail beds can't be cured by foot care. Allowing nails to grow longer might only reduce the perception somewhat. If beds start nearer tip of toes and/or are narrow, then the reality is still just the way they are inherently built. I tend not to prefer small "beds" and at a certain point, when it's bizarre or extreme, I find it ugly. These are not that extreme though.

I think I understood you and I agree with what you are saying, lol

Nails beds just not very good. Nothing you can do with whatever genes you're given.

>Nothing you can do with whatever genes you're given. Trransparently obvious given the genetic penchant for nasty men to rip on women, driving them to cover their feet, to the detriment of feet lovers. Thanks for these valuable opinions!

Ya, there’s other flaws in a woman’s foot that I can overlook, but for me, bad nail beds are pretty much always a deal breaker. In this case, not sure how so many of you are able to overlook McKenna’s disproportionate nail beds and give her a beautiful rating

Well said. Ye Olde Doc and Catsman. Genetics decide. That's what makes feet and hamds interesting for me. There is a level of influence one can have over the look but most is genetic. So seeing beautiful or attractive feet, in the wild, is truly a gift.

calm down white knight shes not gonna banf you

@Bumb Yes you can do nothing about your genes but what you can do how you take care of your feet. Also your ridiculous claim of nasty men ripping on women (eternal victims) is typical. Its easier to blame men for all her insecurities and complexes eventually it doesn't stop there, all problems in life along with mental issues blame it on men. Fact is problem of one individual is his or her own problem not all under that gender. If a woman covers her feet is probably she is lazy and doesn't care much about them and its not detriment to feet lover actually just the opposite we are spared of less than mediocre or downright ugly.

I'm rejecting your comment @podobear. If it makes you feel any better, I rejected Bumb's comment at the time, longtoelova's comment earlier today and now yours. The thing they all have in common is making assumptions that have no relevance to her feet; about men being nasty, about what motivated a fellow user, and about the motivations of a teenage girl we know nothing about.

I think people are being kind to her not just because she is very cute but cause till she has been a very prolific child starlet has given some very memorable performances, she is a exceptionally talented artist. She is still very young probably still has to adapt into adulthood.

Per the site rules page: "Blurring or censoring minors is not sufficient - they must be completely cropped out of the frame, or the photo should not be uploaded at all."

Photo removal Summary Duplicate: 10 Fake / Wrong Person: 2 Illegal / Copyrighted: 1 No Feet Showing: 4 Underage: 34

Click the link that says slip, on the lower right. That's the guild slip, where members make notes about reported pictures. The most recent pics removed had to do with an underage boy she was posing with.

Is the link at the bottom of the page? I'm apparently missing it somehow

It's always right under the bottom-left photo, in the pink bar.

Changed mind, zoomed onto those big toes, and had to change rating downward to 2 stars. I would actively avoid these. (my test for going that low). Pretty girl otherwise, and not a judgment on personality or any other aspect other than feet.

I unreported it

thanks. These guys won't be able to be smart for long

GOOD - the NFS reports from the idiots that think the arch is not part of the foot is getting tiring!

Margot's feet are not that great at all. 1* from me. McKenna, I give 4*. It's all about perspective, others will have a complete different view than me

This has happened twice for Mckenna!

Friend, people today are lazy, they think that if they type Mckenna Grace Feet into Google, they will find all of the more than 80 photos that exist of her haha, today you have to hunt for everything, things exist without an exact name.

Royal gallery? What’s that?

yeah, what a coincidence!

Nothing much to see here and her feet are average . Dunno what the fuss is about

We definitely need more pics for this Cutie 💞🔥😏

and the pic is not UA, the other girl is Kennedy Garcia and she is 20 https://www.famousbirthdays.com/people/kennedy-garcia.html so stop doing false reports

Saying this with that profile picture of Ed Sheeran has me laughing harder than it should lmaooo. McKenna recently turned 18 so I assume you aren’t even older than 21?

19, i know im young compared to everyone here but foot fetishism knows no age

We also had Xochitl Gomez earlier this year, and she's only two months older than Mckenna.

UrFeetAreUgly you're 3 years younger than me.

@UrFeetAreUgly Well said. Good to have you in the foot fetish community.

Jesus Christ dude.

Agreed

even after the date of her 18 birthday we must wait for new pics, because legit pics must be dated after her 18 birthday, otherwise are UA in any case, even after 10 years

Yoda would want age 21+ tbh...

Why? That would be completely absurd.

it would be absurd the opposite, why wait 18 years old if after the 18 birthday u can upload 16years old pics? rules are these, clear and simple

@TheGuardian I think @Hellbilly666 meant age 21+ would be absurd.

5 stars right off the bat