Yeah, imagine that. You'd be as wrong then as you are now.

3 is not a "bad" rating, it's for feet that one personally finds acceptable. I rated 4 stars, but 3 makes more sense to me than 5. (I see from an old comment I even had it at 3). To me, they are somewhere between just fine and pretty good. Maybe it was because they were better than expected, esp at her age, that I leaned to 4 instead of 3. I found Roseanne weirdly attractive back when she first broke onto the comedy scene so many years ago.

She was always on the pudgy side, cute face, more than decent feet. I liked her when she first burst upon the scene.

90s and early 2000s I was fascinated by all shades of blue as well as purple. Still LOVE it but the best is ever changing variety. I try not to get too stuck or get rigid on a particular style. Life is more interesting that way.

She looks like a bag lady the feet aren't bad though

dayyyyum she's hot af

Its a foot appreciation site. What’s with all of the rhetoric?

We do live in the world of poltical correctness!

Does anyone know the story behind this image?

Yeah I've seen worse still not good

Yeah I've seen worse 2 stars no more

Crazy nightcrawler say what?

I know the feeling, I cannot resist

I <3 her voice. You know, when she sings.

when it comes to the feet you must look at all shapes and sizes to admire the beauty!

easy now.

Reported this post Iam a member of.the guild.no need for rude comments

It's not hateful, it's my *opinion* of an awful, gross & vulgar woman. I've never liked her, and I still remember how she deliberately mocked our national anthem. And I'm entitled to my opinion.

@BiB, I almost puked when she deliberatly disrespected our anthem, flag, and country hated her ever since

Agree