WP please justify. thanks

@atw it is, regardless of however you think you intended it. Not because of your made-up word, but the meaning behind it (which you also stated). You could have made a racist or homophobic remark and not have meant it to be hateful either, but that wouldn't have changed the meaning either. Those comments would have been rejected as well. Nothing to get sore over. I saw your previous comment, I was simply stating my reasoning for making the points in the latter two sentences. Essentially: lighten up and don't be judgmental of people different from you, especially when you yourself aren't considered "normal" in contemporary society.

Man I am one of the last people to get worked up over someone not agreeing with me or understanding my meaning behind something improperly. It's cool. You were totally allowed to question a meaning of something I posted. Because you did so it gave me the opportunity to set the record straight that nope...it was not posted up as anything Hate. I can see after reading it that some people could think I was bashing it...but I wasn't and felt the need to correct anyone that may have taken it that way. On a much lighter note...we are considered a lot more normal in today's world than we were a decade ago. It is folks like us that are secure enough in ourselves to not really care what other people think about our love for feet.

@pidgeon66..."So what if she was transgender?" Answer:Certainly not my thing ...I say to each his own. "If you don't like it you're free to look at a different gallery." Answer:It's easy enough for me to just check out the comments and pay no attention to these types of pictures. There Pidgeon I repeated myself again just for you. Seems you are pretty much having an issue here with yourself since I had pretty much already stated in comment form your points you were beefly trying to make my way??? So no argument out of me. If the "Chude" part made it to your "Hate" speech then all I can say is yeah you need to reject it. Since I made the word up & it was a total joke made with not 1 ounce of hate in in. So yes you should reject it because I am not going to alter or retract a sense of humor nor worry in the least if attempting to make light of a subject in a fun manner is going to (Seriously???)set off someones Hate Red Flags. So please do what you feel you must do. I hope you continue to enjoy the site.

@BackInBlack60 : Lol...this pornstar "Name Game" is funny. The Sandy Bottoms from Twitter is a younger pretty gal, that has a very different look from this one. When I have more information on this topic,I'll post it in the comment section of this wall.

@atw So what if she was transgender? If you don't like it you're free to look at a different gallery. You realize you have a foot fetish, actively pursue it on the internet, and to the majority of society you're a weirdo, I hope? I'm rejecting the comment calling her a "chude" (wtf?) and whatnot. Yeah, that's hate speech.

@Sterne - I learned a new word, 'travesti,' and must not be commonly used in America. The Sandy Bottoms @Montresor found on Twitter must be a different person with same name, and no wonder... fairly typical 'porn star' name. In America, we have a 'Name Game' we play to find out what our porn star name might be. Take the name of your pet as your first name and the name of the street you grew up on as your last name. That's your Porn Star name. Try it! Should work OK in French too. Some are pretty funny. Mine, not so much.

@TheRealLoverBoy1 : You're welcome, bro...

She is neither a traversti nor a transgender. I've seen through the adult content pictures I didn't uploaded that she has 100% feminine attributes.She does adult movies with girls as partners. If she was a travesti or a she-male , I wouldn't create a gallery for her.

@atw217 - That's what I do; when I'm reviewing comments, I rarely look at the feet pics anyway, unless someone has referenced a particularly hot one in their comment. Doesn't really disturb me violently to see some of 'those' kind, I just don't want to dwell there for long and couldn't get excited about those, but just stay kinda detached, like... "OH! So that's a person painting their toenails who wasn't born a woman. OK, whatever. [Click to something else]" Pretty easy to do.

Thxs Black60. I am with you on never really noticing them before. LOL. Guess due to the Guild it is not just perks we will find in our comment approving travels! Yikes!!! LMAO I say to each his own. It's easy enough for me to just check out the comments and pay no attention to these types of pictures. Certainly not my thing at all! Ha!

@Sterne - No bio listed on IMDb but looks like @Montresor found a Twitter account. Different 'Sandy Bottoms?'

@atw217 - Yes, and always has. I'm not certain, because I've never bothered the site admin about it, but suspect it's more of a practical matter in that those galleries will attract more members who are into that sort of thing ("drives traffic" or "Hey, Must Be the Moneyyy!") and also there are probably dozens or hundreds of those listings in IMDb which say, "Actress" so no way to automatically screen them out. Just be happy he *did* remove a gallery of a male celeb that someone added once as a joke(?) - trying to remember who it was but have forgotten at the moment.

Mr. Google think yes, from Twitter: The latest from SandyBottoms (@MsSandyBottoms). queer-femme-sex worker-law student-activist. Oakland. No. Come here to see women, why finding these kind so many?

I must think yes Jay / Owen