Vivianne Pasmanter
Go to IMDb page
Feet rating stats (153 total votes)
68
beautiful
beautiful
38
nice
nice
36
ok
ok
5
bad
bad
6
ugly
ugly
Rating: | (nice feet) |
You Rated: | (click to rate) |
Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts |
Gallery Settings
more info8 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Vivianne Pasmanter's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
2014-03-22 01:23:18 @AR - Forgot about that. As I said, *if* I have (and I think I have in the distant old-wall past), it wasn't the celeb who was underage, but some extraneous kiddo appearing in-frame, 'collateral damage' as it were. As @Hate says, he doesn't think that applies there. I'm sort of a purist - I don't really want *anyone* of *any* age other than the celeb in question (and maybe her similar-age GIRLfriends) in my photos.
|
2014-03-21 13:01:16 @BIB It's right in the site guidelines. Uploading pictures of celebs wherein they're younger than 17 is not allowed. Please report such pictures as "Underage". Do not unreport such pictures, or you will get banned.
|
2014-03-21 12:54:32 @Rex> But if you unreport an underage pic, it comes with a ban
Where did you get your info? Pretty sure that's not always correct, and I may have actually done it before in cases like this where it wasn't the celeb herself who was underage. I'm still here... so far. |
2014-03-20 16:23:00 It would easy to do a decent crop for someone who really wanted to pic.
|
2014-03-20 16:11:28 @Hate But if you unreport an underage pic, it comes with a ban.
|
Reported: Underage
2014-03-20 16:06:01 @ Angus...Yeah I can see how this pic would upset a bloak who goes by a different stroke, but the site guideline simply states "celebrities" under 17 years of age. Reporting this picture if you find it offensive is totally up to you and others who feel the same. I may be a little more lenient though. I can see blurring out the face and feet of the tot. Instead of underage, try using PQ. Not saying that is going to work any better. If the uploaders see them reported they have every right to unreport them.
|
2014-03-20 11:13:26 @warped - And yet, they remain, even after being reported. And Eli so far hasn't answered. My apologies @Pixxxie; guess she called that one accurately.
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2014-03-18 02:05:35 Feet okay,,,but little girl's face shouldn't be shown
|